- CORRESPONDENCE
By
-
Christoph Trattner
-
University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
-
Marc Schmitt argues that the danger of artificial intelligence lies in passive use, and that universities should teach students to argue with AI models and assess how well they do so (see M. Schmitt Nature 657, 575; 2026). One measurement is missing. Assessing how a student spars while the model is present captures performance with the partner in the ring, not what the student can do once the partner leaves. The two can diverge: in a randomized trial involving secondary-school mathematics students, unrestricted chatbot access raised practice scores, but lowered performance on a subsequent exam taken without it (H. Bastani et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2422633122; 2025). An evaluation that stopped at the assisted session would have called that tutor a success.
Nature 659, 264 (2026)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-03559-1
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Related Articles
-
Use AI as a sparring partner, not an oracle
-
Why universities need to radically rethink exams in the age of AI
-
I caught my students using AI to cheat in an exam — here’s what universities must do to stamp this out
Subjects
Latest on:
- Education
- Technology
- Machine learning
-
Safety alerts must reach visiting PhD students
Correspondence
-
Chinese doctoral students in clinical medicine can graduate without a thesis — more degrees to follow
News
-
In Indonesia, PhD students blow the whistle on bad supervision
Career Feature
-
Will AI grant reviews make science more conservative?
Nature Index
-
Meet Neuropixels: how probes that track hundreds of brain cells at once are revolutionizing neuroscience
Technology Feature
-
Patrick Stewart dies: how Captain Picard inspired today’s science leaders
News
-
AI-hallucinated citations should be treated as research misconduct
Correspondence
-
AI watermarking efforts must encourage independent public scrutiny
Correspondence
-
Can maths survive AI? Fields medallist Terence Tao calls for a ‘Maths 2.0’ world
World View