Can plants defend coasts against storms?

Nature作者:Rusty A. Feagin2026年10月21日查看原文 ↗
  • NEWS AND VIEWS

Salt-marsh plants can protect inland areas against huge waves — but seemingly only up to a point, and big storms cause progressive damage.

By

  1. Rusty A. Feagin
    1. Rusty A. Feagin is in the Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology and the Department of Ocean Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.

  2. M. Luisa Martínez
    1. M. Luisa Martínez is at the Network of Functional Ecology, Institute of Ecology (INECOL), Xalapa 91073, Mexico.

Plants and other organisms can reduce the erosion of coasts by winds and waves. The physical structures of sand-dune and wetland plants, seagrasses, oysters and macroalgae can slow the flow of water and wind, capture sediment and modify soil. Over time, these organisms can also build land, store greenhouse gases, provide habitats for other species and beautify beaches and wetlands1. In some cases, they can be used as a nature-based solution in place of engineered structures. But coastal engineers and planners are often hesitant to incorporate them into construction projects, because their ability to perform in extreme conditions is unknown. Writing in Nature, Willemsen et al.2 determine the limits of coastal protection that salt-marsh plants can provide.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-03063-6

References

  1. Martínez, M. L. et al. Ecol. Econ. 63, 254–272 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Willemsen, P. W. J. M. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11145-8 (2026).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Möller, I. et al. Nature Geosci. 7, 727–731 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva, R., Martínez, M. L., Odériz, I., Mendoza, E. & Feagin, R. A. Coast. Eng. 109, 53–62 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nepf, H. M. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 123–142 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leonardi, N., Ganju, N. K. & Fagherazzi, S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 64–68 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maximiliano-Cordova, C. et al. Estuaries Coasts 42, 1730–1741 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Howes, N. C. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14014–14019 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feagin, R. A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10109–10113 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feagin, R. A. et al. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg7135 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van de Koppel, J., van der Wal, D., Bakker, J. P. & Herman, P. M. J. Am. Nat. 165, E1–E12 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

  • Environmental sciences
  • Geography
  • The contribution of salt marshes to wave attenuation during extreme storms

    Article

  • Amazon carbon emissions driven by human actions amplified by droughts

    Article

  • Enzyme-embedded polyesters for accelerated biodegradation in the deep sea

    Article

  • World’s timekeepers upend how they adjust time to avoid catastrophic ‘negative second’

    News

  • The leap second is dead. Long live the leap hour?

    News

  • Over 20,000 precolonial earthworks in the Southwest Amazonia

    Article