Chemist-aligned retrosynthesis by ensembling diverse inductive bias models

Nature作者:Krzysztof Maziarz2026年9月21日正文已收录本站
  • Article
  • Published:
  • Guoqing Liu  (刘国庆)  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-8512-40491 na1,
  • Felix Pultar  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-47341 na1,
  • John Gardner1,
  • Tobias Gensch1,
  • Jean Helie1,
  • Hubert Misztela2,
  • Austin Tripp3,
  • Junren Li1,
  • Aleksei Kornev2,
  • Piotr Gaiński1,4,
  • Holger Hoefling2,
  • Mike Fortunato2,
  • Rishi Gupta  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-01262,
  • Andrew Baxter  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-32655,
  • Darren L. Poole  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5050-59965,
  • Jennifer M. Elward5,
  • Adrian Krzyzanowski5,
  • Peter Pogány5,
  • Stephen D. Pickett5,
  • Ian D. Wall5,
  • Christopher M. Bishop1,
  • Philip G. Humphreys5,
  • James A. Lumley  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6060-889X5,
  • Mario P. Wiesenfeldt6 &
  • …
  • Marwin H. S. Segler  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-05461 

Nature (2026) Cite this article

We’re sharing this article early to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. This version is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record. All legal disclaimers apply.

Abstract

Chemical synthesis remains a critical bottleneck in the discovery and manufacture of functional small molecules1−3. While AI-assisted synthesis planning has proliferated in recent years, a detailed understanding of its failure modes has not been achieved, and models still struggle with predicting less frequent, yet strategically critical reactions, as well as hallucinated, incorrect predictions misaligned with chemists’ expectations4−12. In this work, we analyze the failure modes of current AI models and propose RetroChimera: a frontier retrosynthesis model, built upon two newly developed components with complementary inductive biases, integrated via a novel, learning-based ensembling strategy. Through experiments across several orders of magnitude in data scale, we show RetroChimera outperforms leading baselines, demonstrating robustness outside the training data, as well as the ability to learn from very small numbers of examples per reaction class. Using both pairwise and pointwise setups, we find that organic chemists prefer predictions from RetroChimera over published reference reactions and over other AI models. Finally, we demonstrate zero-shot transfer and fine-tuning on internal datasets from two major pharmaceutical companies, showing robust generalization under distribution shift. Our work demonstrates the viability of deep learning for accurate synthesis prediction in increasingly challenging regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

27,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscription info for Chinese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Chinese customers. Please go to naturechina.com to subscribe to this journal.

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Krzysztof Maziarz, Guoqing Liu, Felix Pultar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Microsoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK

    Krzysztof Maziarz, Guoqing Liu  (刘国庆), Felix Pultar, John Gardner, Tobias Gensch, Jean Helie, Junren Li, Piotr Gaiński, Christopher M. Bishop & Marwin H. S. Segler

  2. Novartis Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland

    Hubert Misztela, Aleksei Kornev, Holger Hoefling, Mike Fortunato & Rishi Gupta

  3. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Austin Tripp

  4. Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

    Piotr Gaiński

  5. GSK, Stevenage, UK

    Andrew Baxter, Darren L. Poole, Jennifer M. Elward, Adrian Krzyzanowski, Peter Pogány, Stephen D. Pickett, Ian D. Wall, Philip G. Humphreys & James A. Lumley

  6. Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

    Mario P. Wiesenfeldt

Authors

  1. Krzysztof Maziarz
  2. Guoqing Liu  (刘国庆)
  3. Felix Pultar
  4. John Gardner
  5. Tobias Gensch
  6. Jean Helie
  7. Hubert Misztela
  8. Austin Tripp
  9. Junren Li
  10. Aleksei Kornev
  11. Piotr Gaiński
  12. Holger Hoefling
  13. Mike Fortunato
  14. Rishi Gupta
  15. Andrew Baxter
  16. Darren L. Poole
  17. Jennifer M. Elward
  18. Adrian Krzyzanowski
  19. Peter Pogány
  20. Stephen D. Pickett
  21. Ian D. Wall
  22. Christopher M. Bishop
  23. Philip G. Humphreys
  24. James A. Lumley
  25. Mario P. Wiesenfeldt
  26. Marwin H. S. Segler

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Krzysztof Maziarz, Guoqing Liu  (刘国庆) or Marwin H. S. Segler.

Supplementary information

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maziarz, K., Liu, G., Pultar, F. et al. Chemist-aligned retrosynthesis by ensembling diverse inductive bias models. Nature (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11160-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11160-9