- NEWS
The awards highlight weird, funny and improbable research that also makes you think.
By
-
Chris Simms
-
Chris Simms is a science writer based in Somerset, UK.
-

Researchers found that land use is a key factor in the decomposition of underwear, more so than other soil characteristics.Credit: Gabriela Brändle/Agroscope
The recognition and prestige of a Nobel prize for ground-breaking work comes with a gold medal and the equivalent of a million dollars. The parody version, an Ig Nobel prize, devised to celebrate research that makes people laugh, and then think, might not deliver on the cash front, but it does bring considerable renown.
This year’s Ig Nobel prizes were awarded on 3 September at a ceremony in Zurich, Switzerland. They include a biomechanics prize for creating a precise definition of kissing, which works across species and excludes the transfer of food during the act1, a physics award that aims to please with experiments to design a splash-free urinal2 and a soil-science award for investigating what happens if you bury and then dig up 1,000 pairs of underwear3 (see ‘The 2026 Ig Nobel prizewinners in full’).
“I hope that, as well as finding the research amusing, people will come away thinking a little differently about our place in the animal kingdom,” says Matilda Brindle, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Oxford, who was a co-author of the kissing study. “My jaw hit the floor when I got the phone call. It’s certainly one of my proudest life achievements.”
Smooching with Neanderthals
Brindle’s team steamily defined kissing as a “non-agonistic interaction involving directed, intraspecific, oral–oral contact with some movement of the lips/mouthparts and no food transfer”. According to this definition, polar bears, some birds and even ants kiss. What’s more, not only do other primates also snog each other, but the team also traced the behaviour back around 21.5 million years to the ancestor of all the large apes. This means that ancient Homo sapiens would probably have been smooching Neanderthals.
“We’ve shown that animals kiss and when it could have evolved in the primates; the obvious next step is understanding why. If this award helps spark more curiosity about this sort of question, then that’s a pretty wonderful outcome,” says Brindle.
Levitating frogs
Previous winners of Ig Nobel prizes have included researchers who studied the preferred pizza toppings of rainbow lizards in Togo4, the levitation of live frogs using magnets5 and research showing that London taxi drivers have particularly large hippocampi in their brains6.
In the prize’s early days — it was launched in 1991 by Marc Abrahams, editor of the satirical magazine Annals of Improbable Research — receiving an Ig Nobel prize was deemed insulting by some, but now many researchers see the awards as a great career boost.

How a silly science prize changed my career
“The visibility they bring is enormous. It exposes research to audiences that would never otherwise encounter it,” says Changhong Cao, a mechanical engineer at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, who is part of the team that won this year’s technology prize for showing that a mosquito’s mouthparts can be repurposed as a nozzle for high-resolution, low-cost 3D printing7.
Cao says that the work shows that even things that people find unpleasant can turn out to be useful — sometimes in the most unexpected way.
Another example of unpalatable items coming in handy is the work of Franz Bender and Marcel van der Heijden at the University of Zurich, who were the researchers responsible for the underwear-burial study. They enlisted citizen scientists from more than 25 nations to bury the garments and dig them up two months later, which provided insight into how biologically active the soil was.
The 2026 Ig Nobel prizewinners in full
BIOMECHANICS
Matilda Brindle, Catherine Talbot and Stuart West, for devising a precise definition of kissing1.
ECONOMICS
Paul Piff, Daniel Stancato, Stéphane Côté, Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton and Dacher Keltner, for amassing evidence that wealthy people are more likely to engage in unethical behavior than are people with lower incomes8.
CHEMISTRY
Sanchari Banerjee, Nathan Coussens, François-Xavier Gallat, Nitish Sathyanarayanan, Jandhyam Srikanth, Koichiro Yagi, James Gray, Stephen Tobe, Barbara Stay, Leonard Chavas and Subramanian Ramaswamy, for discovering that milk proteins from cockroaches that give birth to live young contain three times as much energy as milk proteins from cows9.
MEDICINE
The late Tokuji Unno, for the 1977 study called ‘How to Blow the Nose — An Aerodynamic Study of the Nose Blowing’10.
BIOLOGY
João Miguel Alves-Nunes, Adriano Fellone, Selma Maria Almeida-Santos, Carlos Roberto de Medeiros, Ivan Sazima and Otavio Augusto Vuolo Marques, for gently stepping on various parts of snakes to try to learn what induces a venomous snake to bite a human11.
PHYSICS
Randy Hurd, Zhao Pan, Tadd Truscott and Kaveeshan Thurairajah, for theoretical and experimental attempts to design a splash-free urinal2.
TECHNOLOGY
Justin Puma, Zhen Yang, Evan Johnston, Zixin Zhang, Xiaoyi Lan, Lingzhi Zhang, Hongyu Hou, Zixin He, Ali Afify, Megan Creighton, Jianyu Li and Changhong Cao, for pioneering the use of mosquito proboscises as high-resolution 3D printing nozzles, a process called necroprinting7.
OLFACTION
Ilona Croy, Tomasz Frackowiak, Thomas Hummel and Agnieszka Sorokowska, for collecting evidence that babies smell great to their parents, but teenagers do not12.
PEACE
Jaimie Arona Krems, Rebecka Hahnel-Peeters, Laureon Merrie, Keelah Williams and Daniel Sznycer, for documenting that people value friends who are mean to those that they dislike13.
SOIL SCIENCE
Franz Bender, Marcel van der Heijden, Atlant Bieri and Pia Viviani, for burying 1,000 pairs of underwear in more than 25 nations and digging them up two months later3.
Like candy from a baby
Other awards this year include the physics prize for a team that experimentally validated what makes fluid splash back from urinals and suggested redesigns that could cut the spray to just 1.4% of what is commonly experienced.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-02650-x
References
Brindle, M., Talbot, C. F. & West, S. Evol. Hum. Behav. 47, 106788 (2026).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Thurairajah, K. et al. PNAS Nexus 4, pgaf087 (2025).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bender, S. F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Science 387, 936 (2025).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Dendi, D., Segniagbeto, G. H., Meek, R. & Luiselli, L. Afr. J. Ecol. 61, 226–227 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Berry, M. V. & Geim, A. K. Eur. J. Phys. 18, 307 (1997).
Article Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4398–4403 (2000).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Puma, J. et al. Sci. Adv. 11, eadw9953 (2025).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R. & Keltner, D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4086–4091 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. et al. IUCrJ 3, 282–293 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Unno, T. & Yajima, H. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 80, 11–17 (1997).
Google Scholar
Alves-Nunes, J. M. et al. Sci. Rep. 14, 10230 (2024).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Croy, I., Frackowiak, T., Hummel, T. & Sorokowska, A. Chemosens. Percept. 10, 81–87 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Krems, J. A., Hahnel-Peeters, R. K., Merrie, L. A., Williams, K. E. G. & Sznycer, D. Evol. Hum. Behav. 44, 88–93 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Download references
Related Articles
-
How a silly science prize changed my career
-
Abel Prize celebrates union of mathematics and computer science
-
How to win a Nobel prize: what kind of scientist scoops medals?
-
Through the nanoscope: A Nobel Prize gallery
-
Economics Nobel prize won by researchers who showed how science boosts growth
-
Will AI ever win its own Nobel? Some predict a prize-worthy science discovery soon
Subjects
Latest on:
- Media
- Events
- Technology
-
Say hello to the next generation of lobsters — August’s best science images
News
-
Will Meta’s deal make social media safe for kids? Researchers are dubious
News Q&A
-
Will AI make our dreams all look the same?
Correspondence
-
Satellite images before Nepal disaster showed warning signs
News Q&A
-
‘Robot Olympics’ reveal humanoids’ rapid progress — and flaws
News
-
Glacier collapse caused Nepal’s deadly flash flood — a sign of things to come?
News
-
Satellite images before Nepal disaster showed warning signs
News Q&A
-
Self-driving cars make mistakes, and now users can see why
News & Views
-
From Trojan horses to AI-proof exams: how professors are tackling students’ AI use
Career Feature