Scientists don’t need more trust, they need public allies

Nature作者:Anandita C. Sabherwal2026年8月4日正文已收录本站
  • CORRESPONDENCE

By

  1. Anandita C. Sabherwal
    1. Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

  2. Gregg Sparkman
    1. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.

Your News Feature reports scientists saying that they are widely trusted but might be “losing the influence battle” (see Nature 655, 22–25; 2026). Our research shows how that battle can be won: by pairing scientists’ voices with those of the public (A. C. Sabherwal and G. Sparkman Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 123, e2533408123; 2026).

Nature 656, 266 (2026)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-02424-5

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

  • Have people stopped trusting science? The data tell a surprising story

  • Scientists should recognize their own political biases to build public trust

  • See more letters to the editor

Subjects

Latest on:

  • Scientific community
  • Lab life
  • Society
  • Scientists up in arms about cuts to UK physics and astronomy

    News

  • AI agents are checking the scientific literature — and spotting decades-old errors

    News

  • James Bond, not Bond James: why scientific publishing must respect name order

    Career Column

  • Lab leaders should follow football’s lead and have coaching qualifications

    Correspondence

  • The three-and-beyond-body problem: juggling kids, travel and careers in academia

    Career Column

  • Science-backed tips on how to avoid distractions

    Career Feature

  • Privacy risks from medical AI tools are not shared equally

    News & Views

  • How I use statistics and my law degree to fight human-rights abuses

    Career Feature

  • New-deal mortgage programmes benefited white borrowers disproportionately

    Article