Atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> plateau sustained by NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission rise and southward shift

Nature正文已收录本站
  • Lan, X., Thoning, K. W. & Dlugokencky, E. J. Trends in globally averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. https://doi.org/10.15138/P8XG-AA10 (NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, 2026).

  • Kirschke, S. et al. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat. Geosci. 6, 813–823 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).

  • Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, M. et al. Recent decreases in fossil-fuel emissions of ethane and methane derived from firn air. Nature 476, 198–201 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, I. J. et al. Long-term decline of global atmospheric ethane concentrations and implications for methane. Nature 488, 490–494 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, H. et al. A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4. Science 352, 80–84 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. in The World Economy through the Lens of the United Nations (eds Ocampo, J. A. et al.) 170–201 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817345.003.0007 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

  • Skeie, R. B., Hodnebrog, Ø. & Myhre, G. Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 317 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, P. et al. Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Nature 443, 439–443 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O. & Jacob, D. J. Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5367–5372 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McNorton, J. et al. Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH4 growth rate from 1999 to 2006. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 7943–7956 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, M. et al. Role of atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5373–5377 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McDuffie, E. E. et al. A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 3413–3442 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoesly, R. M. et al. Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 369–408 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-W. et al. Satellite-observed U.S. power plant NOx emission reductions and their impact on air quality. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L22812 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vestreng, V. et al. Evolution of NOx emissions in Europe with focus on road transport control measures. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 1503–1520 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Tropospheric ozone change from 1980 to 2010 dominated by equatorward redistribution of emissions. Nat. Geosci. 9, 875–879 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, K. H. & Jacob, D. J. A new model mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of isoprene: global effects on oxidants, nitrogen oxides, organic products, and secondary organic aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 9613–9640 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naus, S. et al. Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 407–424 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, M. et al. Re-evaluation of the lifetimes of the major CFCs and CH3CCl3 using atmospheric trends. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 2691–2702 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Montzka, S. A. et al. Small interannual variability of global atmospheric hydroxyl. Science 331, 67–69 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, P. K. et al. Methyl chloroform continues to constrain the hydroxyl (OH) variability in the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 126, e2020JD033862 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuur, J., Koks, E. E. & Hall, J. W. Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains. Nat. Commun. 13, 4351 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X.-T. et al. Trade-linked shipping CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 945–951 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., Henshaw, J. & McInnes, G. Impact of aircraft and surface emissions of nitrogen oxides on tropospheric ozone and global warming. Nature 355, 69–71 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. S. et al. HO2/OH and RO2/HO2 ratios during the tropospheric OH photochemistry experiment: measurement and theory. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, 6379–6391 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoor, P. et al. The impact of traffic emissions on atmospheric ozone and OH: results from QUANTIFY. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 3113–3136 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, A. L. et al. Atmospheric methane isotopic record favors fossil sources flat in 1980s and 1990s with recent increase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.USA 113, 10791–10796 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, R. et al. Global and regional CH4 emissions for 1995–2013 derived from atmospheric CH4, δ13C–CH4, and δD-CH4 observations and a chemical transport model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 125, e2020JD032903 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, N. et al. Methane emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 147 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, S. et al. Inventory of anthropogenic methane emissions in mainland China from 1980 to 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 14545–14562 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, N. et al. Emissions from the oil and gas sectors, coal mining and ruminant farming drive methane growth over the past three decades. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 99, 309–337 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, M. et al. Insights into the spatial distribution of global, national, and subnational greenhouse gas emissions in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v8.0). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 16, 2811–2830 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund-Isaksson, L. Global anthropogenic methane emissions 2005–2030: technical mitigation potentials and costs. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 9079–9096 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D. & Hsu, J. Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L09803 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sindelarova, K. et al. Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 9317–9341 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Liu, X., Wu, C. & Lin, G. Regional to global distributions, trends, and drivers of biogenic volatile organic compound emission from 2001 to 2020. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 3309–3328 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, M. et al. Gridded emissions of air pollutants for the period 1970–2012 within EDGAR v4.3.2. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 1987–2013 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, M. et al. High resolution temporal profiles in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. Sci. Data 7, 121 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L. et al. A machine-learning-guided adaptive algorithm to reduce the computational cost of integrating kinetics in global atmospheric chemistry models: application to GEOS-Chem versions 12.0.0 and 12.9.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 1677–1687 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. A. et al. Methyl, ethyl, and propyl nitrates: global distribution and impacts on reactive nitrogen in remote marine environments. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 12429–12451 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. The role of chlorine in global tropospheric chemistry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 3981–4003 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelaro, R. et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf, G. R. et al. Landscape fire emissions from the 5th version of the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED5). Sci. Data 12, 1870 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C. & Koshak, W. J. Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117, D20307 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudman, R. C. et al. Steps towards a mechanistic model of global soil nitric oxide emissions: implementation and space based-constraints. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7779–7795 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, A. et al. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3181–3210 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krol, M. & Lelieveld, J. Can the variability in tropospheric OH be deduced from measurements of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (methyl chloroform)? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108, 4125 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, P., Hauglustaine, D. A., Peylin, P., Carouge, C. & Ciais, P. Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 2635–2656 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prinn, R. G. et al. Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L07809 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. et al. Reconciling the bottom-up and top-down estimates of the methane chemical sink using multiple observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 789–807 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, V. et al. Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5277–5298 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. et al. Enhanced atmospheric oxidation toward carbon neutrality reduces methane’s climate forcing. Nat. Commun. 15, 3148 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A. & Myhre, G. Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 285–302 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Contributions of world regions to the global tropospheric ozone burden change from 1980 to 2010. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL089184 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lassey, K. R., Lowe, D. C. & Manning, M. R. The trend in atmospheric methane δ13C and implications for isotopic constraints on the global methane budget. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 41–49 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lassey, K. R., Etheridge, D. M., Lowe, D. C., Smith, A. M. & Ferretti, D. F. Centennial evolution of the atmospheric methane budget: what do the carbon isotopes tell us? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 2119–2139 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, X. et al. Improved constraints on global methane emissions and sinks using δ13C–CH4. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2021GB007000 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q.-L. & Li, W.-J. A calibrated measurement of the atomic weight of carbon. Chin. Sci. Bull. 35, 290–296 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunois, M. et al. Global methane budget 2000–2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 1873–1958 (2025).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, I. et al. Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 96, 13033–13065 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murguia-Flores, F., Arndt, S., Ganesan, A. L., Murray-Tortarolo, G. & Hornibrook, E. R. C. Soil Methanotrophy Model (MeMo v1.0): a process-based model to quantify global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2009–2032 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwietzke, S. et al. Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database. Nature 538, 88–91 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riddell-Young, B. et al. Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH4 growth indicated by trends in atmospheric δD–CH4 and δ13C–CH4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2516543122 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, C. A. et al. Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the oxidation of methane by the hydroxyl radical. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 95, 22455–22462 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saueressig, G. et al. Carbon 13 and D kinetic isotope effects in the reactions of CH4 with O(1D) and OH: new laboratory measurements and their implications for the isotopic composition of stratospheric methane. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106, 23127–23138 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saueressig, G., Bergamaschi, P., Crowley, J. N., Fischer, H. & Harris, G. W. Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the reaction of CH4 with Cl atoms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1225–1228 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, R., Crutzen, P. J. & Heimann, M. An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 11, 43–76 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Lowe, D. C., Manning, M. R., Sparks, R. J. & van Velthoven, P. F. J. The 13C, 14C, and 18O isotopic composition of CO, CH4, and CO2 in the higher southern latitudes lower stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 100, 26163–26172 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • King, S. L., Quay, P. D. & Lansdown, J. M. The 13C/12C kinetic isotope effect for soil oxidation of methane at ambient atmospheric concentrations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 94, 18273–18277 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, Y. et al. Improved global wetland carbon isotopic signatures support post-2006 microbial methane emission increase. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 159 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. et al. Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature. Nat. Commun. 10, 3420 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. et al. Data for Atmospheric CH4 plateau sustained by NOx emission rise and southward shift. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21486324 (2026).