- CORRESPONDENCE
By
- Daniel L. Gardner1 &
- Katta Spiel2
-
Katie Seaborn
-
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
-
-
Daniel L. Gardner
-
Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
-
-
Katta Spiel
-
Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
-
Generative artificial-intelligence models, notably large language models (LLMs), are disrupting intellectual-property rights. Crucially, present-day copyright licences cannot accommodate human adaptation and prevent AI misuse simultaneously. Copyright holders can, for instance, select the BY-ND ‘no derivatives’ Creative Commons (CC) licence to protect against AI misuse. However, this also prevents legitimate creative human adaptation of the copyrighted material.
Nature 656, 1070 (2026)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-02633-y
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Related Articles
-
AI firms must play fair when they use academic data in training
-
Intellectual property and data privacy: the hidden risks of AI
-
Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly
Subjects
Latest on:
- Intellectual-property rights
- Publishing
- Law
-
Transparent research: can big tech learn from big pharma?
Editorial
-
What incentives do companies need to publish research?
Nature Index
-
Here’s why China’s science and innovation model is thriving
Nature Index
-
The future of peer review requires AI support, not AI bans
Correspondence
-
Sleuth identifies dozens of studies that used the wrong antibody
News
-
Staggering 90% of biomedical papers now show signs of AI help
News
-
South Africa’s scientists must register with official body or risk prison, according to draft law
News
-
The forgotten 20 million: why is the world neglecting Afghanistan’s girls and women?
Editorial
-
How I use statistics and my law degree to fight human-rights abuses
Career Feature